Why did the value of stablecoins fall?
Unlike stablecoin Tether, TeraUSD, the third largest
stablecoin by market capitalization, has no reserves to support its value. It
relies on another cryptocurrency called Luna to maintain its value. When the
value of a certain coin is less than $1. A trader can burn TeraUSD and get a
similar Luna. Similarly, if TeraUSD exceeds $1, buyers can burn Luna and
receive the same amount on TeraUSD.
These transactions actively control supply and demand,
preventing the currency from moving too far from its initial peg. The system
relies heavily on traders and stakeholders to deal with excessive deviations
from the peg. Investors have invested nearly $14 billion in TeraUSD on Anchor
Protocol, the lending and lending protocol of the founder of Terra. However, as
soon as Tera collapsed, depositors on Anchor withdrew their TeraUSD and the
price fell further without any support. The price did not return to the
predicted level, and both TeraUSD and Luna lost their value. Terra's founder,
Do Quan, tried to garner support for the coin on Twitter, but he could not, and
the token continued its downward spiral.
Yet such a revolution can have winners and losers,
even among stablecoins. According to Coinmarketcap, Tether's market cap fell
from $83 billion last Monday to $75.6 billion, rising from $48 billion before
the dollar dissolution to $51 billion. “They have more confidence in USDC
because they have USDC reserves like BlackRock,” said Marcus Sotirio, analyst
at UK-based digital asset broker GlobalBlack. Meanwhile Rook and the others see
more control along the way. “Stablecoins are a low-hanging fruit, and I think
we are going to see some policies for them,” said Michelle Bond, CEO of the
Digital Property Markets Association. “There are so many different issues –
what are acceptable reserves? Who can issue stablecoins? How should auditors
and accountants be booked? What kinds of disclosures are made to clients?”
0 Comments